Targeting high-volume keywords seems like an obvious SEO strategy more searches mean more potential traffic. However, the harsh reality is that not all keywords are realistically attainable, especially for new or low-authority websites. Some keywords are so competitive that ranking for them would require years of effort and significant resources. This is where keyword difficulty becomes crucial a metric that helps you identify which keywords you can realistically rank for given your site’s current authority and resources. Understanding and properly using keyword difficulty transforms keyword research from wishful thinking into strategic, achievable SEO planning.
Navigate This Post
What Is Keyword Difficulty?
Keyword difficulty (KD) is a metric estimating how hard it would be to rank for a specific keyword, typically expressed as a score from 0 to 100, where higher numbers indicate greater difficulty. This metric evaluates the competitive landscape for a keyword, analyzing factors like the authority of currently ranking pages, the number of backlinks they have, content quality, and domain strength to predict how challenging it would be for a new page to break into the top 10 results.
Different SEO tools calculate keyword difficulty using their own proprietary algorithms, but most consider similar core factors: the number and quality of backlinks pointing to top-ranking pages, domain authority of sites currently ranking, content quality and comprehensiveness of ranking pages, and on-page optimization strength of competitors. Some tools also factor in search volume, click-through rate potential, and other nuanced signals.
Keyword difficulty helps answer the critical question every SEO faces: “Can I realistically rank for this keyword with my current resources and authority?” A keyword with 100,000 monthly searches means nothing if you have no realistic chance of ranking on page one. Conversely, a keyword with only 500 monthly searches but low difficulty might drive more actual traffic if you can achieve top rankings.
How Keyword Difficulty Is Calculated
While each tool uses slightly different methodologies, understanding common factors helps you interpret KD scores effectively.
Backlink analysis typically dominates keyword difficulty calculations. Tools examine the number of backlinks pointing to top-ranking pages, the authority of domains providing those links, and the overall link profile strength of competing pages. Pages with hundreds of high-quality backlinks from authoritative domains create high difficulty barriers.
Domain authority evaluation assesses the overall strength of domains currently ranking. When established, high-authority sites like Wikipedia, major news outlets, or industry leaders dominate results, keyword difficulty increases significantly. Competing against these authority giants requires substantial resources.
Content quality assessment evaluates how comprehensive, well-structured, and optimized ranking content is. Long-form, detailed, expertly-written content raises difficulty bars by setting higher quality standards for competition.
SERP features influence difficulty when featured snippets, knowledge panels, or other rich results occupy prominent positions, reducing available ranking spots and organic click-through rates.
On-page optimization strength considers how well current ranking pages are optimized for target keywords through title tags, headers, and strategic keyword placement.
Historical ranking stability factors in how long current top-ranking pages have held positions, with established pages that have ranked for years presenting tougher competition than frequently churning results.
Most tools combine these factors through proprietary formulas producing 0-100 difficulty scores, though exact calculations vary by platform.
Keyword Difficulty Across Different Tools
Major SEO tools each have their own KD metrics with slightly different scales and methodologies.
Ahrefs Keyword Difficulty uses a 0-100 scale primarily based on backlink profiles of top-ranking pages. Ahrefs emphasizes links heavily, making their KD scores particularly focused on link-building requirements. Scores above 60 generally indicate very competitive keywords requiring significant backlink acquisition.
SEMrush Keyword Difficulty also uses 0-100 scale but incorporates broader factors including domain authority, on-page optimization, and SERP features. SEMrush difficulty scores tend to be slightly more conservative, with scores above 70 indicating highly competitive keywords.
Moz Keyword Difficulty calculates based on Page Authority and Domain Authority of ranking pages, also using 0-100 scale. Moz’s metric particularly emphasizes domain-level authority, making it useful for understanding overall competitive landscape.
Ubersuggest Keyword Difficulty provides simplified assessments on 0-100 scale with color-coded difficulty levels (easy, medium, hard, very hard), making interpretation straightforward for beginners.
Because methodologies differ, the same keyword might score 45 in Ahrefs, 60 in SEMrush, and 55 in Moz. Don’t obsess over precise numbers—instead, use KD scores to compare keywords within the same tool and identify relative difficulty patterns.
Interpreting Keyword Difficulty Scores
Understanding what different KD score ranges mean helps you make strategic decisions.
KD 0-20 (Very Easy): These keywords typically have little competition, with ranking pages having weak backlink profiles and low domain authority. New websites can often rank for these keywords relatively quickly with quality content and basic optimization. However, be cautious—very low KD sometimes indicates extremely low search volume or irrelevant traffic.
KD 21-40 (Easy): Moderate competition exists but ranking remains achievable for newer sites with quality content and some SEO effort. These keywords often represent sweet spots for small businesses and newer sites—enough search volume to matter but competitive enough to be realistic targets.
KD 41-60 (Medium): Significant competition requires quality content, solid on-page optimization, and some backlink acquisition. Established sites with moderate authority can target these keywords, while newer sites should proceed cautiously or focus on long-tail variations.
KD 61-80 (Hard): Strong competition demands comprehensive content, excellent on-page optimization, and substantial backlink profiles. Only established sites with proven authority should target these keywords as primary focus. Newer sites might occasionally rank for these but shouldn’t rely on them for traffic growth strategies.
KD 81-100 (Very Hard): Extremely competitive keywords dominated by high-authority sites with massive backlink profiles. These typically include industry head terms, highly commercial keywords, and topics dominated by major brands. Most sites should avoid these unless they have exceptional authority and resources.
Factors Beyond Keyword Difficulty
While KD scores provide valuable guidance, other factors influence your actual ranking probability.
Your domain authority matters tremendously. A site with Domain Authority 60 can target higher-difficulty keywords than a site with DA 20. KD scores don’t account for your specific site’s authority, so adjust interpretation based on your current standing.
Topical authority in your niche helps even lower-authority sites compete for keywords where they’ve demonstrated expertise. If you’ve published comprehensive content about specific topics, you may rank for higher-difficulty keywords in those areas than KD suggests.
Search intent alignment sometimes allows well-matched content to rank despite high KD. If existing results don’t perfectly satisfy intent and your content does, you might succeed even with lower authority.
Content quality differentiation enables outranking competitors when you create genuinely superior content. Exceptional depth, unique research, or superior user experience can overcome authority disadvantages.
Local search dynamics alter difficulty for location-based keywords. Local pack results depend heavily on Google Business Profile optimization and proximity, not just traditional ranking factors.
Trending topics and emerging keywords may show low KD simply because competition hasn’t developed yet. Early movers on trending keywords can establish positions before difficulty increases.
Strategic Keyword Selection Using Difficulty
Effective keyword strategies balance difficulty with opportunity to create achievable, impactful SEO plans.
Match KD to your site’s authority by targeting keywords slightly above your comfort zone challenging enough to drive growth but realistic enough to achieve. New sites should focus on KD 0-30, established sites can pursue KD 40-60, and authority sites can target KD 60+.
Create keyword difficulty tiers in your strategy with quick wins (low KD), medium-term targets (moderate KD), and aspirational keywords (high KD). This tiered approach delivers short-term traffic while building toward competitive terms.
Pursue long-tail variations of high-difficulty head terms. “Content marketing” might have KD 85, but “content marketing strategies for B2B SaaS startups” might have KD 25 while still capturing relevant traffic.
Consider search volume relative to difficulty by calculating opportunity scores. A keyword with 1,000 monthly searches and KD 20 may offer better ROI than one with 10,000 searches and KD 80.
Analyze SERP features beyond just KD scores. Featured snippets, local packs, or knowledge panels significantly affect click-through rates regardless of where you rank.
Evaluate commercial intent alongside difficulty. A high-difficulty keyword that converts at 10% may justify more investment than a low-difficulty keyword converting at 0.5%.
Track competitor movements to identify when high-difficulty keywords become more accessible as competitors shift focus or when your authority grows sufficiently to compete.
Common Keyword Difficulty Mistakes
Several errors undermine keyword selection despite using KD metrics.
Targeting only low-difficulty keywords creates ceilings on growth potential. While starting with easy wins makes sense, never challenging yourself prevents building authority needed for competitive terms.
Ignoring search volume in favor of low difficulty wastes effort on keywords nobody searches. Balance difficulty with sufficient volume to drive meaningful traffic.
Assuming high KD means impossible prevents you from pursuing valuable competitive keywords where you might succeed through superior content or strategic advantages.
Not accounting for your specific authority leads to either overly aggressive targeting (aiming too high) or overly conservative strategy (missing achievable opportunities).
Failing to reassess difficulty over time means missing opportunities as your authority grows or competition changes. Keywords that were too difficult six months ago might now be realistic targets.
Overlooking SERP analysis beyond KD numbers misses nuances like weak content ranking despite high KD scores, or highly commercial SERPs where organic clicks are limited.
Choosing keywords purely by difficulty ranking without considering relevance, business value, or content creation capacity leads to traffic that doesn’t support business goals.
Improving Your Ability to Rank for Difficult Keywords
Strategic efforts increase your competitiveness for higher-difficulty keywords over time.
Build domain authority systematically through quality content, strategic backlink acquisition, and establishing topical expertise. As your authority grows, higher-difficulty keywords become accessible.
Create content clusters around competitive topics by targeting numerous related long-tail keywords that build topical authority, eventually positioning you to compete for difficult head terms.
Earn authoritative backlinks through digital PR, creating linkable assets, strategic outreach, and becoming a cited source in your industry. Quality backlinks directly impact your ability to rank for competitive terms.
Improve technical SEO to ensure you’re not handicapped by technical issues when competing for difficult keywords. Fast load times, mobile optimization, and clean architecture matter more as competition increases.
Develop expertise signals including author credentials, original research, comprehensive guides, and thought leadership that demonstrate E-E-A-T for competitive topics.
Target adjacent keywords first by ranking for related, easier terms that establish topical relevance, then progressively moving toward more competitive keywords in the same topic area.
When to Ignore Keyword Difficulty
Certain situations justify pursuing high-difficulty keywords despite concerning KD scores.
Brand building priorities may justify targeting competitive industry terms even without immediate ranking prospects, establishing long-term positioning and authority.
Informational intent with low competition quality sometimes shows high KD due to authority sites ranking, but those pages may not comprehensively address topics, creating opportunities for superior content.
Strategic importance of certain keywords to your business might warrant investment despite high difficulty when rankings would significantly impact revenue or brand positioning.
Long-term authority building in core topics justifies targeting difficult keywords as part of multi-year strategies, accepting that rankings may take time to develop.
Competitive necessity when competitors rank for high-difficulty keywords means you may need to compete regardless of difficulty to maintain market position.
Conclusion
Keyword difficulty provides essential intelligence for realistic, strategic SEO planning by estimating how challenging it would be to rank for specific keywords. This metric, typically scored 0-100 by various SEO tools, analyzes backlink profiles, domain authority, content quality, and other factors to predict ranking difficulty. Understanding KD scores helps you identify achievable keywords that match your site’s current authority while avoiding wasting resources on unrealistic targets.
Effective keyword strategy uses difficulty as one factor among several, balancing KD with search volume, commercial intent, content creation capacity, and business relevance. New sites should focus on low-difficulty keywords for quick wins while progressively building authority to compete for more difficult terms. Established sites can pursue moderate-difficulty keywords while maintaining long-term aspirations for highly competitive head terms.
Remember that keyword difficulty is an estimate, not a guarantee. Superior content, strategic advantages, and persistent optimization can overcome difficulty predictions. Conversely, low KD doesn’t guarantee success if content quality or intent alignment falls short. Use keyword difficulty as a strategic planning tool that helps you make informed decisions about where to invest SEO resources, creating achievable roadmaps that build authority progressively while delivering measurable results at every stage. When you balance ambition with realism through proper difficulty assessment, you transform keyword research from hopeful guessing into strategic planning that actually drives traffic and business growth.
